Tomorrow morning Central Time I’ll be interviewing Alex Linder.  The shape of the discussion is pretty well set, but I would be interested to know if readers have their own questions they would like to see asked.

If such questions differ from what I already have planned, and providing they are productive, of course, I’ll find some time to ask them.

The three hundred or more delegates to the BNP Conference in Wigan have voted overwhelmingly to commit the party to the leadership’s policy of remaining within the law, remaining a party able to fight elections, and admitting non-whites to membership.  Nick Griffin’s own amendments were accepted.  It is thought this means that sub-groups will be formed to house the non-white applicants.

Does the membership change mean that the party has lost its fourteen-word soul?  Or is it merely a cosmetic and inevitable stratagem to satisfy the requirements of British law?  Or is it, in fact, a golden opportunity for the party to advance its cause by the very laws that the Establishment has used to persecute it?

Here’s Lee Barnes with the upside:

The issue is ... where now for the ‘anti-fascists’ ?

For the general public, who believe their lies, the constant scream of ‘racists’ and ‘nazis’ is the primary weapon in the arsenal of the anti-BNP coalition. But that weapon is now rendered defunct. They cannot call the BNP ‘racist’ anymore as we will have many non-white members joining. They can’t call the BNP ‘nazi’ anymore as our new non-white members are obviously not nazis. They can’t call the BNP ‘racist’ anymore either as non-whites will be joining. Therefore the whole tactics and strategy of the Far Left and the media has to change - but how ?

They haven’t got a clue.

Lee goes on to claim that the membership change is “a political revolution”:

READ MORE...

I’ve been mailed links to two resources by different readers.  Each resource has high research value, and I thought your attention should be drawn to them.

The first is the authoritative source for anyone who wants to examine the spoken parliamentary record - like, for example, when the post-war Labour government first decided to invite Jamaican immigrants into our midst.  This, of course, is Hansard and is:

generated from information from Hansard, the Official Report of debates in Parliament.  Information presented here is generated from the publicly available XML files ...  There’s Hansard itself; by volume, just the Lords sittings, Commons sittings or Westminster Hall sittings. You can also view Written Answers, Written Statements, Lords reports or Grand Committee reports.

We also have extracted lists of People who are recorded as having spoken, Constituencies, Offices, Acts, Bills and Divisions. You can also see information about the Source files containing the original XML and the Data files we generate from them.

I am indebted to JB for the link.

The second link is for something quite different but no less useful, and it is to “perhaps the most comprehensive biomedical site on the net”, according to the reader, James, who sent it:

BioMedSearch is an enhanced version of the NIH PubMed search that combines MedLine/PubMed data with data from other sources to make the most comprehensive biomedical literature search available. BioMedSearch also provides advanced account features that allow saved searches, alerts, saving documents to portfolios, commenting on documents and portfolios, and sharing documents with other registered users. Registering for BioMedSearch is free.

MR readers are a useful lot, I’m pleased to say.

Soren and I have decided to re-open the Radio Project - that’s ours, not Mr Rockefeller’s.  Initially, at least, the interviewing is likely to be done by me.  Soren gamely agreed to be my first victim.  The result is a long and, I think, pretty interesting investigation of Soren’s political development.

There was a microphone issue at the Chicago end of the operation, and the stereo reflects that at the moment.  If we can re-process the recording and eliminate that we will do so.

The button on the sidebar will take you to the Radio Page.

Soren talks about his intellectual journey and one or two of the ideas and people he has encountered along the way. The interviewer is a total novice. Running time 45min 36sec. File size 41.7MB.

So Major Nidal Malik Hasan, 39, a Middle-Eastern Moslem born and raised in Virginia, trained as an army psychologist, but “devout” and deeply opposed to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, goes on a shooting rampage at America’s biggest military basis.  Thirteen people are dead, thirty wounded.  And what do we get to hear?  Why, that Maj Hasan (i) had been battling racial harassment because of his “Middle Eastern ethnicity”, (ii) had been “affected” by the stories of soldiers returning from theatre with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, and (iii) was “concerned” about his own forthcoming deployment to Afghanistan.

Here’s the real story:

a) America is/was the aggressor in both wars.  The Iraq War was an illegal war that has claimed the lives of maybe a million Iraqis.  All told, four thousand Americans have died in these two adventures for no purpose beyond the security of Israel, the politics and profits of oil, and tax-theft by the military-industrial complex.  Yesterday another thirteen died.

b) Multiracialism doesn’t work anywhere in the West, even in an authoritarian structure like the US Army, and amounts to no more than a vast crime against Europeans.  Or whites if you prefer.

c) The mainstream media is always ready to (i) blame “racist whites”, (ii) offer “explanations” for mass murder if the perp is non-white.  Do you think that either of these poisonous little memes would be dripped into the public’s ear if Nidal Malik Hasan had been born Nigel Malcolm Hayes?

Continuing on from Wednesday’s Part 1 post …

Social Policy

The first duty and highest goal of the Federal government will be:

To match the conditions of life of the British people to the attributes of their nature, the interests of their blood and the wishes of their hearts.

In social policy, that implies a far-reaching, even total revolution of the mind so that the people may, after so many decades of officially engendered self-censorship, self-degradation and self-estrangement, approach themselves once again with clear eyes and clear conscience, and begin to live the life they deserve.

This revolution of the mind will not be accomplished solely by the undoing of past crimes against them or by the heavy push in the direction of the good which government can give.  The ideas that commend the good - ideas which, though they have been known by some thinking nationalists for a long time, are not known by the common man - must fill all the voids left by the driving out of the destructive and criminal ideas of the past.  That is the true foundation on which the political future will rest.  Accordingly, government has a role in promoting not only those ideas through its own machinery but the new intellectual class that has generated them, and can carry them and the politics of the new age forward.

That said, here is an outline of how the nationalist “heavy push” will be structured:

READ MORE...

Nation-building and the Constitution

The first task of a nationalist government in these islands, assuming that government comes into being through democratic elections and not through other means, is to declare this coming into government an act of revolution with all the destructive and creative legal and political powers of change that are predisposed by such events.  Since by this declaration the government will lose its mandate, having disavowed the process which brought it to power, it shall rely upon a priori revolutionary status for the legitimacy to rule.  Further, it will attach provisionality to this status, it being necessary that a provisional government shall enact the transition from the old national settlement to the new.

First and foremost in the process of change, then, will be a Declaration of the Impending Dissolution of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, along with the voiding of the current Constitution serving the Union.  A new state, based on the principle of federation, shall be brought into being.  England, Scotland and Wales shall equally be member states within it, while Northern Ireland shall have the status of a self-governing territory, along with the Channel Islands and the Isle of Man.  The division of powers between the Federal government in London and the subsidiary governments shall be established in a Constitutional Conference to be held within 50 days of the Declaration. 

The Conference will settle all issues pertaining to the new national settlement, including the Articles of Federation and the adaption of certain elements of the existing British Constitution to the new founding Constitution.  These latter will include the role of Monarchy, membership and powers of the House of Lords, the Rule of Law, Habeas Corpus, judicial independence and trial by jury, the supremacy of Parliament, free democratic elections, separation of power, etc.

READ MORE...